TL;DR
Turn your wind-down time into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
At a hearing Tuesday, Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer argued that prosecutors had not presented enough evidence to prove she killed her three children and asked a judge to acquit her. The jury at her first trial deadlocked 11 to 1 in her favor; the judge has not ruled, and prosecutors have not decided whether to retry the case.
Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer asked a judge Tuesday to acquit her, arguing that prosecutors had not presented enough evidence to prove she killed her three children. The request marks a shift from the defense at her first trial, which focused on whether mental illness made her legally responsible; that trial ended Sept. 4 with a jury deadlocked 11 to 1 in Clancy’s favor.
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington told Judge William Sullivan that the case was based on speculation. He pointed to Clancy’s condition when she was found badly injured and bleeding outside the family home, as well as her reported lack of memory of events after waking in a hospital. Reddington asked where there was an admission that she had killed the children. He did not offer an alternative account of who was responsible.
At the first trial, Reddington did not dispute that Clancy killed the children. Instead, the defense argued that she was not criminally responsible because of mental disease, specifically postpartum psychosis. Prosecutors maintain that evidence presented at trial was sufficient to convict her. They argued that Clancy knew her actions were wrong when she used exercise bands to strangle Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, and said she arranged for her husband to leave the house to pick up medicine and dinner.
Prosecutor Shanan Buckingham called the defense’s new argument “laughable.” The judge did not rule at Tuesday’s hearing, and no date was set for another trial. Plymouth County District Attorney Timothy Cruz said prosecutors had not decided whether to retry Clancy.
A New Defense After Jury Deadlock
The hearing could shape whether the case proceeds to another trial and what charges prosecutors pursue. Clancy remains charged with murder. Prosecutors could retry her on first-degree murder charges, seek a trial on lesser charges such as second-degree murder or manslaughter, or drop the case, according to the report.
The change in defense approach also puts the evidence of who committed the killings directly at issue. The first trial centered on Clancy’s mental state and criminal responsibility; Reddington’s latest argument challenges whether the prosecution proved she killed the children at all. The judge’s decision on the acquittal request, and the prosecutor’s decision about a retrial, remain pending.
The First Trial’s Mental Health Focus
The children were killed at the family’s home in 2023. At Clancy’s trial, her former husband and first responders testified that they arrived and found that she had tried to kill herself after the children’s deaths. The defense relied on an insanity argument involving postpartum psychosis, while prosecutors argued she understood her actions were wrong.
The jury finished deliberating on Sept. 4 without reaching a verdict. It was split 11 to 1 in favor of Clancy, according to the report. A separate dispute remains over the lone juror who favored conviction: Clancy’s lawyers argue he should have been removed after the foreperson said he was not listening to the law on reasonable doubt. The juror, Michael Desronvil, has said through his lawyer that he stood by his position.
“This entire case is based on speculation.”
— Defense attorney Kevin Reddington
Ruling and Retrial Remain Pending
Judge Sullivan has not ruled on the acquittal request or on the defense’s broader request to dismiss the case. Prosecutors have not said whether they will retry Clancy, which charges they might pursue, or whether they will drop the case. No second-trial date has been set.
The source report does not provide a detailed account of all the evidence presented at trial, and it remains unclear what weight the judge will give to Reddington’s arguments. The dispute over the holdout juror also remains unresolved.
Judge and Prosecutors Face Decisions
The next developments are a ruling from Judge Sullivan on the defense motions and a decision by the district attorney’s office about how to proceed. Clancy is expected to remain at a psychiatric hospital while the case is unresolved. The report says that a murder conviction could carry a life sentence; if she were acquitted, the judge could order her confined to a mental health facility.
Key Questions
What did Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer ask the judge to do?
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington asked Judge William Sullivan to acquit Clancy, arguing that prosecutors had not presented enough evidence to prove she killed her children.
What happened at Clancy’s first trial?
The jury deadlocked on Sept. 4, split 11 to 1 in Clancy’s favor. The defense focused on whether mental illness made her legally responsible, while prosecutors argued she knew her actions were wrong.
Will Clancy face a second trial?
That has not been decided. Prosecutors may retry her on first-degree murder charges, pursue lesser charges, or drop the case. No new trial date has been set.
What charges does Clancy face?
Clancy remains charged with murder. Prosecutors have not said whether they would pursue the same charges in another trial or seek lesser charges such as second-degree murder or manslaughter.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
